Denver Spy Files: What's in the depositions

Rocky Mountain News

December 18, 2002

Related Stories

TAKE ACTION:  All Nations Alliance Calls for Accountability for Spy Files

 

1/20/03: If elected mayor, Mares would curb Denver police surveillance -- Matt Larson, The Denver Post

 

1/20/03: Mares wants a 'spy file' panel: Candidate says cops should only collect data on lawbreakers -- Kevin Vaughan, Rocky Mountain News

 

1/17/03: Citizens urge panel to probe police spy files -- Amy Herdy, Denver Pos

 

1/17/03: Public hearings urged on 'spy files' -- John C. Ensslin, Rocky Mountain News

 

1/12/03: They Know When You Are Sleeping -- Kathy Pollitt, The Nation

 

1/6/03: Spy-file scrutiny unsettles targets, Cop says citizens' worries unfounded -- Amy Herdy, Denver Post

 

1/5/03: The Denver Police Get Their Say: Police intelligence activity common -- John Ingold, Denver Post

 

1/4/03: Police could take home 'spy files' -- Kevin Vaughan, Rocky Mountain News

 

1/3/03: Spy-files Policy In Dispute: City Official Says No Such Directive Existed While Zavaras Was Police Chief--Amy Herdy, Denver Post

 

12/30/02: Activist Community Strikes Back at The Denver Post -- Letters to the Editor

 

12/27/02: Denver Post seeks full disclosure of police spy files -- Amy Herdy, Denver Post

 

12/25/02: Denver Auditor requests records on spy files -- Amy Herdy, Denver Post

 

12/24/02: Police chief seeks internal spy-files probe: Denver spokeswoman confirms report -- Amy Herdy, Denver Post

 

12/23/02: Former Denver Manager of Safety Tries to Wash his Hands Clean of Spy Files -- By Amy Herdy, Denver Post

 

12/23/02: Zavaras: Spy file abuse a surprise; He believed policy was being followed in info gathering -- Owen S. Good, Rocky Mountain News

 

12/22/02: All Nation's Alliance Prods Mayoral Candidates Spy Files -- Amy Herdy, Denver Post

 

12/21/02: Going Electronic, Denver Reveals Long-Term Surveillance --  Ford Fessenden with Michael Moss, New York Times

 

12/20/02: Group asks cost of police spy files: Auditor Mares considering probe -- Amy Herdy, Denver Post

 

12/20/02: Civil Extremists: If Dissent is a Crime, Just Lock Us Up -- Editorial, Boulder Daily Camera

12/19/02: 'Spy file' target seeks scrutiny of cops: Police didn't tell activist of rival's plot to kill him -- Amy Herdy and Carol Kreck, Denver Post

12/18/02: Spy files lacked consistent rules: Depositions indicate Denver cops didn't have clear policies -- Peggy Lowe, Kevin Vaughan and John C. Ensslin, Rocky Mountain News

12/18/02: The filing nun: Suit takes off; Police spy papers lead woman of the cloth to seek cloak of justice -- Peggy Lowe, Rocky Mountain News

 

12/18/02: Denver Spy Files: What's in the depositions -- Rocky Mountain News

 

12/18/02: Denver Spy Files: Excerpts from the depositions -- Rocky Mountain News

 

More Stories...

Key findings taken from 11 depositions made as part of the ACLU's federal lawsuit against Denver over the spy files:

• Police policy: Police had a policy on intelligence gathering prior to March 2002, but detectives in the intelligence bureau were unaware of the guidelines. A deputy chief said the policy was never implemented.

• Subjects of files: Some of the groups and individuals who are the subject of spy files include the Chiapas Coalition, the American Indian Movement, End the Politics of Cruelty, Justice for Meρa and nearly 100 Denver Public Schools students.

• Review panel: The three-judge panel appointed by Mayor Wellington Webb to review the spy files was barred by City Attorney Wally Wortham from seeing paper files, surveillance photos or videotapes. They were allowed to see the computer database.

• Classifications: A longtime secretary in the intelligence bureau, Kathleen Miklich, was allowed to classify some groups as "criminal extremist."

• Multiple classifications: In the files, the same group could be classified as criminal extremist or just as protesters. Thus, some were labeled "biker gang," others "motorcycle group."

• Federal standards: The department didn't believe it needed to comply with federal standards on intelligence gathering because it didn't receive federal funds.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.
 

Hit Counter