Why Mr Bush should invade Zimbabwe.
By Miles Kington.
March 20, 2002
Q. Why does President Bush want a war against Saddam Hussein?
A. Because the Americans are on a winning streak. They defeated the
Taliban. They got lots of medals in the Winter Olympics. They feel
they can whup anyone now. They almost invaded Canada a month ago, you
know.
Q. Why?
A. Because Canada beat the Americans in the final of the Olympic ice
hockey, and they wanted revenge.
Q. So why didn't they invade Canada?
A. Because they thought the Canadians might defeat them again.
Q. Do the Americans think that they can beat Iraq?
A. Mmm. They're not sure. But there's a principle at stake. You see,
they don't think it's right that a world leader should have poison
weapons and nuclear arms at his disposal, and a record of invading
weaker countries.
Q. Are we talking about Saddam Hussein or President Bush here?
A. Saddam Hussein.
Q. Right. So the idea is to mount a surprise invasion of Iraq?
A. Something like that.
Q. But if everyone knows that Bush is planning a surprise assault on
Iraq, it won't be a surprise, will it?
A. Absolutely. The thing is, you see...
Q. Yes?
A. Promise you won't tell a soul?
Q. Yes.
A. Well, Bush is only talking up this attack on Iraq so much because
he is actually planning a surprise attack on a completely different
country.
Q. Really?
A. Sure. If everyone thinks he is going to invade Iraq, it will come
as a total shock to everyone when he really launches an assault on...
Q. Go on. Tell me.
A. Zimbabwe.
Q. You're kidding!
A. No. President Bush wants to take out Zimbabwe.
Q. Why?
A. Because he thinks he can win there. He isn't so sure he can beat
Saddam Hussein. So he is going to take on Mugabe instead.
Q. Gosh. But why..?
A. A matter of principle.
Q. Which principle?
A. The principle that you only fight a war you know you can win.
Q. But Mugabe isn't developing germ warfare, is he? Or nuclear weapons?
A. Lord, no. But Mugabe's a pushover, and that's the main thing. Unless...
Q. Unless what?
A. Well, I shouldn't really tell you this...
Q. No, go on.
A. The thing is that every time the Americans declare war on some
world leader and say that he has to be exterminated, that world leader
thereby gets a magic lease of life. The Americans said they would get
rid of Castro 40 years ago. Gaddafi 20 years ago. Saddam Hussein 10
years ago, etc etc. A year ago they said that Osama bin Laden was for
the chop. Well, he's on the run, maybe, but on the way out? And now
Yasser Arafat... So if they say that Mugabe is on their wanted list,
the odds are that he is here to stay.
Q. Does this work the other way round?
A. How do you mean?
Q. Well, if the Americans say they are all for someone, is that
someone therefore doomed?
A. Sure. The Americans were all for the Shah. For President Marcos.
For Gorbachev. So, bye bye Shah, bye bye Gorbachev, bye bye Marcos...
Q. Hold on, aren't the Americans all for Tony Blair?
A. Sure.
Q. Does this mean...?
A. Sure.
Q. I see... So what's going to happen to Iraq if the Americans don't
invade it?
A. Oh, it's going to get invaded all right.
Q. By the Americans?
A. Can you keep a secret?
Q. Yes.
A. By the Israelis.
Q. Just a minute... You mean, the Americans are going to get the
Israelis to do their dirty...?
A. The Israelis owe the Americans a lot of favours. More than that I
cannot say.
Q. One last question. Why does the Zimbabwean opposition leader have a
name which is written as Tsvangirai but pronounced as Changirai?
A. Can you keep a secret?
Q. Of course.
A. I have no idea.
If you want to know more about the world situation, keep tuned to this
station.
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml . If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.